Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:11

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why do liberals refuse to define what a woman is and what does that mean for the future of feminism?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Mosquitoes are here early. How to keep the world’s deadliest animal out of your backyard. - NJ.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
DC-area pediatrician on CDC urging summer camp operators to screen for measles immunity - WTOP
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Are there currently any Linux distros that use AI features?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Retailers Seen Using Stablecoins to Push Back Against Card Fees - Bloomberg
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Dakota Johnson Is “Always Psyched” To Film Sex Scenes - The Cut
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.